Worries About Job Losses Increase The Chances Of Heart Attack And Stroke.
Women who have taxing jobs with trifling in check over their engaged days are at higher endanger for heart attacks or the need for coronary alternative surgery, new research suggests. Furthermore, worrying about losing one's work also raised the odds of having cardiovascular illness risk factors such as high blood pressure and higher cholesterol levels - but not realistic heart attacks, beat or death, the researchers said store. The study, presented Sunday at the annual get-together of the American Heart Association in Chicago, breaks additional ground for being one of the first to look at the effect of work-related burden on women's health.
Most previous studies have focused on men and, yes, those studies found that operation stress upped males' advantage for cardiovascular disease, too. Women comprise inhumanly half of the US workforce today, with 70 percent of all women holding some indulgent of job, said research senior author Dr Michelle A Albert, an partner physician at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston penile enlargement price raton. Albert and her colleagues looked at more than 17000 female robustness professionals, with an undistinguished age of 57, who showed no signs of cardiovascular disease at the beginning of the study.
Participants responded to statements about how draining their matter was, such as - "My berth allows me to make a lot of decisions on my own" or "My caper requires that I learn new things" or "My calling requires working very fast. Job strain involving mental demand and decision latitude are tied into the concept of skill, how you are allowed to be at your job, is your headache repetitive, does it require you to work at a dissolutely pace".
Over 10 years of follow-up, the researchers well-known that women with high job strain - demanding jobs over which they had seldom control - were more likely to be sedentary and to have high cholesterol. They were also at almost traitorous the risk for a heart attack and at a 43 percent higher gamble to undergo a bypass procedure. The researchers found no significant tie between job strain and either stroke or risk for death.
вторник, 30 января 2018 г.
Certain Medications Is Not Enough In The US
Certain Medications Is Not Enough In The US.
Four out of five doctors who gift cancer were impotent to enjoin their medication of choice at least once during a six-month span because of a drug shortage, according to a new survey. The contemplate also found that more than 75 percent of oncologists were forced to make a major modulate in patient treatment. These changes included altering the regimen of chemotherapy drugs initially prescribed and substituting one of the drugs in a blow-by-blow chemotherapy regimen gambar. Such changes might not be well studied, and it might not be complete if the substitutions will employment as well or be as safe as what the doctor wanted to prescribe, experts say.
And "The drugs we're inasmuch as in shortages are for colon cancer, soul cancer and leukemia," said Dr Keerthi Gogineni, an oncologist who led the gang conducting the survey. "These are drugs for combative but curable cancers. These are our bread-and-butter drugs for community cancers, and they don't necessarily have substitutes products. When we asked populace how they adapted to the shortages, they either switched combinations of drugs or switched one analgesic within a regimen," said Gogineni, of the Abramson Cancer Center and Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.
So "They're making the best of a awkward situation, but, truly, we don't have a atmosphere of how these substitutions might change survival outcomes". Results of the assess were published as a letter in the Dec 19, 2013 efflux of the New England Journal of Medicine. The measurement included more than 200 physicians who routinely prescribe cancer drugs. When substitutions have to be made, it's often a generic medicine that's unavailable. Sixty percent of doctors surveyed reported having to determine a more up-market brand-name drug to persevere treatment in the face of a shortage.
The difference in cost can be staggering, however. When a generic hallucinogen called fluorouracil was unavailable, substituting the brand-name dose Xeloda was 140 times more overpriced than the desired drug, according to the survey. Another option is to delay treatment, but again it's not sure what effect waiting might have on an individual patient's cancer. Forty-three percent of oncologists delayed curing during a dope shortage, according to the survey.
Complicating matters for doctors is that there are no formal guidelines for making substitutions. Almost 70 percent of the oncologists surveyed said their cancer center or rule had no regular guidelines to uphold in their decision-making. Generic chemotherapy drugs have been at risk of shortages since 2006, according to horizon information accompanying the survey results. As many as 70 percent of deaden shortages occur due to a breakdown in production, according to the US Food and Drug Administration.
Four out of five doctors who gift cancer were impotent to enjoin their medication of choice at least once during a six-month span because of a drug shortage, according to a new survey. The contemplate also found that more than 75 percent of oncologists were forced to make a major modulate in patient treatment. These changes included altering the regimen of chemotherapy drugs initially prescribed and substituting one of the drugs in a blow-by-blow chemotherapy regimen gambar. Such changes might not be well studied, and it might not be complete if the substitutions will employment as well or be as safe as what the doctor wanted to prescribe, experts say.
And "The drugs we're inasmuch as in shortages are for colon cancer, soul cancer and leukemia," said Dr Keerthi Gogineni, an oncologist who led the gang conducting the survey. "These are drugs for combative but curable cancers. These are our bread-and-butter drugs for community cancers, and they don't necessarily have substitutes products. When we asked populace how they adapted to the shortages, they either switched combinations of drugs or switched one analgesic within a regimen," said Gogineni, of the Abramson Cancer Center and Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.
So "They're making the best of a awkward situation, but, truly, we don't have a atmosphere of how these substitutions might change survival outcomes". Results of the assess were published as a letter in the Dec 19, 2013 efflux of the New England Journal of Medicine. The measurement included more than 200 physicians who routinely prescribe cancer drugs. When substitutions have to be made, it's often a generic medicine that's unavailable. Sixty percent of doctors surveyed reported having to determine a more up-market brand-name drug to persevere treatment in the face of a shortage.
The difference in cost can be staggering, however. When a generic hallucinogen called fluorouracil was unavailable, substituting the brand-name dose Xeloda was 140 times more overpriced than the desired drug, according to the survey. Another option is to delay treatment, but again it's not sure what effect waiting might have on an individual patient's cancer. Forty-three percent of oncologists delayed curing during a dope shortage, according to the survey.
Complicating matters for doctors is that there are no formal guidelines for making substitutions. Almost 70 percent of the oncologists surveyed said their cancer center or rule had no regular guidelines to uphold in their decision-making. Generic chemotherapy drugs have been at risk of shortages since 2006, according to horizon information accompanying the survey results. As many as 70 percent of deaden shortages occur due to a breakdown in production, according to the US Food and Drug Administration.
пятница, 26 января 2018 г.
CT Better At Detecting Lung Cancer Than X-Rays
CT Better At Detecting Lung Cancer Than X-Rays.
Routinely screening longtime smokers and departed clumsy smokers for lung cancer using CT scans can line cut the annihilation rate by 20 percent compared to those screened by box X-ray, according to a major US government study. The National Lung Screening Trial included more than 53000 course and ci-devant heavy smokers aged 55 to 74 who were randomly chosen to experience either a "low-dose helical CT" examine or a chest X-ray once a year for three years pills 4 party. Those results, which showed that those who got the CT scans were 20 percent less undoubtedly to lay down one's life than those who received X-rays alone, were initially published in the journal Radiology in November 2010.
The reborn study, published online July 29 in the New England Journal of Medicine, offers a fuller study of the text from the trial, which was funded by the US National Cancer Institute. Detecting lung tumors earlier offers patients the break for earlier treatment tablet. The evidence showed that over the despatch of three years, about 24 percent of the low-dose helical CT screens were positive, while just under 7 percent of the thorax X-rays came back positive, sense there was a suspicious lesion (tissue abnormality).
Helical CT, also called a "spiral" CT scan, provides a more concluded spit and image of the chest than an X-ray. While an X-ray is a only image in which anatomical structures overlap one another, a spiral CT takes images of multiple layers of the lungs to develop a three-dimensional image. About 81 percent of the CT inspect patients needed reinforcement imaging to determine if the suspicious lesion was cancer.
But only about 2,2 percent needed a biopsy of the lung tissue, while another 3,3 percent needed a broncoscopy, in which a tube is threaded down into the airway. "We're very euphoric with that. We mark that means that most of these useful examinations can be followed up with imaging, not an invasive procedure," said Dr Christine D Berg, ruminate on co-investigator and acting replacement guide of the division of cancer prevention at the National Cancer Institute.
The inexhaustible majority of positive screens were "false positives" - 96,4 percent of the CT scans and 94,5 percent of X-rays. False complete means the screening evaluation spots an abnormality, but it turns out not to be cancerous. Instead, most of the abnormalities turned out to be lymph nodes or septic tissues, such as scarring from latest infections.
Routinely screening longtime smokers and departed clumsy smokers for lung cancer using CT scans can line cut the annihilation rate by 20 percent compared to those screened by box X-ray, according to a major US government study. The National Lung Screening Trial included more than 53000 course and ci-devant heavy smokers aged 55 to 74 who were randomly chosen to experience either a "low-dose helical CT" examine or a chest X-ray once a year for three years pills 4 party. Those results, which showed that those who got the CT scans were 20 percent less undoubtedly to lay down one's life than those who received X-rays alone, were initially published in the journal Radiology in November 2010.
The reborn study, published online July 29 in the New England Journal of Medicine, offers a fuller study of the text from the trial, which was funded by the US National Cancer Institute. Detecting lung tumors earlier offers patients the break for earlier treatment tablet. The evidence showed that over the despatch of three years, about 24 percent of the low-dose helical CT screens were positive, while just under 7 percent of the thorax X-rays came back positive, sense there was a suspicious lesion (tissue abnormality).
Helical CT, also called a "spiral" CT scan, provides a more concluded spit and image of the chest than an X-ray. While an X-ray is a only image in which anatomical structures overlap one another, a spiral CT takes images of multiple layers of the lungs to develop a three-dimensional image. About 81 percent of the CT inspect patients needed reinforcement imaging to determine if the suspicious lesion was cancer.
But only about 2,2 percent needed a biopsy of the lung tissue, while another 3,3 percent needed a broncoscopy, in which a tube is threaded down into the airway. "We're very euphoric with that. We mark that means that most of these useful examinations can be followed up with imaging, not an invasive procedure," said Dr Christine D Berg, ruminate on co-investigator and acting replacement guide of the division of cancer prevention at the National Cancer Institute.
The inexhaustible majority of positive screens were "false positives" - 96,4 percent of the CT scans and 94,5 percent of X-rays. False complete means the screening evaluation spots an abnormality, but it turns out not to be cancerous. Instead, most of the abnormalities turned out to be lymph nodes or septic tissues, such as scarring from latest infections.
понедельник, 22 января 2018 г.
Health Hazards Of Smoke From Forest Fires
Health Hazards Of Smoke From Forest Fires.
With record-breaking wildfires searing the American Southwest, experts are anguished not just about the environmental and land damage, but also about trim risks both to nearby residents and to those living farther away. Although at this signification reports are anecdotal, people on the front lines of fitness care in the Southwest are noticing an uptick of respiratory problems all certain groups of people dozz delay spray side effect reviewss. The Gallup Indian Medical Center, which sits on the trimming of the Navajo Reservation in western New Mexico, is whereas a lot of asthma-related complaints, said Heidi Krapfl, superintendent of the environmental health epidemiology dresser at the New Mexico Department of Health in Santa Fe.
Similar problems are being seen in more unapproachable parts of the state. "We've definitely seen patients in the crisis room who have come in with a worsening of their chronic lung disease go for asthma or COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that they've attributed to the smoke," said Dr Mike Richards, key of difficulty medicine at the University of New Mexico Hospital in Albuquerque hungarian pharmacy online. As of Wednesday afternoon, huge wildfires were raging uncontained in southeast Arizona and along the state's frame with Mexico; along the eastern causticity of New Mexico; in multiple locations throughout Texas and along the Texas-Louisiana border, according to the US Forest Service.
For weeks now, Albuquerque has been on the receiving end of gigantic banks of smoke and ash from the Wallow conflagration 200 or so miles away. Smoke and ash have turned the site Sunna red, reduced driving visibility and obscured normally crystal unblemished views of the 11000-foot mountains edging Albuquerque's eastern perimeters. On some days, the whiff of aflame is overwhelming.
Jo Jordan, a 20-year resident of Albuquerque, attributes a seldom encountered migraine to smoke blowing in from the southeast. "I was out and the smoke was just hanging in the air. My throat got prickly and I started with a headache. By the rhythm I got home, I had a migraine," she related. "I had it for a age and a half.
With record-breaking wildfires searing the American Southwest, experts are anguished not just about the environmental and land damage, but also about trim risks both to nearby residents and to those living farther away. Although at this signification reports are anecdotal, people on the front lines of fitness care in the Southwest are noticing an uptick of respiratory problems all certain groups of people dozz delay spray side effect reviewss. The Gallup Indian Medical Center, which sits on the trimming of the Navajo Reservation in western New Mexico, is whereas a lot of asthma-related complaints, said Heidi Krapfl, superintendent of the environmental health epidemiology dresser at the New Mexico Department of Health in Santa Fe.
Similar problems are being seen in more unapproachable parts of the state. "We've definitely seen patients in the crisis room who have come in with a worsening of their chronic lung disease go for asthma or COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that they've attributed to the smoke," said Dr Mike Richards, key of difficulty medicine at the University of New Mexico Hospital in Albuquerque hungarian pharmacy online. As of Wednesday afternoon, huge wildfires were raging uncontained in southeast Arizona and along the state's frame with Mexico; along the eastern causticity of New Mexico; in multiple locations throughout Texas and along the Texas-Louisiana border, according to the US Forest Service.
For weeks now, Albuquerque has been on the receiving end of gigantic banks of smoke and ash from the Wallow conflagration 200 or so miles away. Smoke and ash have turned the site Sunna red, reduced driving visibility and obscured normally crystal unblemished views of the 11000-foot mountains edging Albuquerque's eastern perimeters. On some days, the whiff of aflame is overwhelming.
Jo Jordan, a 20-year resident of Albuquerque, attributes a seldom encountered migraine to smoke blowing in from the southeast. "I was out and the smoke was just hanging in the air. My throat got prickly and I started with a headache. By the rhythm I got home, I had a migraine," she related. "I had it for a age and a half.
воскресенье, 21 января 2018 г.
Very Loud Music Can Cause Hearing Loss In Adolescence
Very Loud Music Can Cause Hearing Loss In Adolescence.
Over the form two decades hearing injury due to "recreational" commotion exposure such as blaring belabor music has risen among adolescent girls, and now approaches levels once upon a time seen only among adolescent boys, a new observe suggests. And teens as a whole are increasingly exposed to snazzy noises that could place their long-term auditory health in jeopardy, the researchers added natural aunties. "In the '80s and old '90s green men experienced this kind of hearing damage in greater numbers, in all probability as a reflection - of what young men and immature women have traditionally done for work and fun," noted study head author Elisabeth Henderson, an MD-candidate in Harvard Medical School's School of Public Health in Boston.
And "This means that boys have loosely been faced with a greater order of risk in the form of occupational rumble exposure, fire alarms, lawn mowers, that big-hearted of thing. But now we're seeing that young women are experiencing this same au courant of damage, too" testimonial pelanggan vimax. Henderson and her colleagues appear their findings in the Dec 27, 2010 online copy of Pediatrics.
To explore the risk for hearing damage among teens, the authors analyzed the results of audiometric testing conducted amidst 4,310 adolescents between the ages of 12 and 19, all of whom participated in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Comparing flashy turmoil conversancy across two periods of heyday (from 1988 to 1994 and from 2005 to 2006), the body determined that the degree of teen hearing loss had generally remained less stable. But there was one exception: teen girls.
Between the two research periods, hearing loss due to loud caterwauling exposure had gone up among adolescent girls, from 11,6 percent to 16,7 percent - a equal that had previously been observed solely all adolescent boys. When asked about their past day's activities, lessons participants revealed that their overall exposure to loud hubbub and/or their use of headphones for music-listening had rocketed up, from just under 20 percent in the belated 1980s and early 1990s to nearly 35 percent of adolescents in 2005-2006.
Over the form two decades hearing injury due to "recreational" commotion exposure such as blaring belabor music has risen among adolescent girls, and now approaches levels once upon a time seen only among adolescent boys, a new observe suggests. And teens as a whole are increasingly exposed to snazzy noises that could place their long-term auditory health in jeopardy, the researchers added natural aunties. "In the '80s and old '90s green men experienced this kind of hearing damage in greater numbers, in all probability as a reflection - of what young men and immature women have traditionally done for work and fun," noted study head author Elisabeth Henderson, an MD-candidate in Harvard Medical School's School of Public Health in Boston.
And "This means that boys have loosely been faced with a greater order of risk in the form of occupational rumble exposure, fire alarms, lawn mowers, that big-hearted of thing. But now we're seeing that young women are experiencing this same au courant of damage, too" testimonial pelanggan vimax. Henderson and her colleagues appear their findings in the Dec 27, 2010 online copy of Pediatrics.
To explore the risk for hearing damage among teens, the authors analyzed the results of audiometric testing conducted amidst 4,310 adolescents between the ages of 12 and 19, all of whom participated in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Comparing flashy turmoil conversancy across two periods of heyday (from 1988 to 1994 and from 2005 to 2006), the body determined that the degree of teen hearing loss had generally remained less stable. But there was one exception: teen girls.
Between the two research periods, hearing loss due to loud caterwauling exposure had gone up among adolescent girls, from 11,6 percent to 16,7 percent - a equal that had previously been observed solely all adolescent boys. When asked about their past day's activities, lessons participants revealed that their overall exposure to loud hubbub and/or their use of headphones for music-listening had rocketed up, from just under 20 percent in the belated 1980s and early 1990s to nearly 35 percent of adolescents in 2005-2006.
Muscle memory
Muscle memory.
Highly dab hand typists in point of fact have trouble identifying positions of many of the keys on a standard QWERTY keyboard, researchers say, suggesting there's much more to typing than routine learning. The novel study "demonstrates that we're talented of doing extremely complicated things without knowing explicitly what we are doing," main researcher Kristy Snyder, a Vanderbilt University gradate student, said in a university news release bowtrolprobiotic. She and her colleagues asked 100 persons to complete a short typing test.
They were then shown a plain keyboard and given 80 seconds to write the letters within the de rigueur keys. On average, these participants were proficient typists, banging out 72 words per miniature with 94 percent accuracy neosizeplus com. However, when quizzed, they could accurately neighbourhood an regular of only 15 letters on the blank keyboard, according to the study published in the newspaper Attention, Perception, andamp; Psychophysics.
Highly dab hand typists in point of fact have trouble identifying positions of many of the keys on a standard QWERTY keyboard, researchers say, suggesting there's much more to typing than routine learning. The novel study "demonstrates that we're talented of doing extremely complicated things without knowing explicitly what we are doing," main researcher Kristy Snyder, a Vanderbilt University gradate student, said in a university news release bowtrolprobiotic. She and her colleagues asked 100 persons to complete a short typing test.
They were then shown a plain keyboard and given 80 seconds to write the letters within the de rigueur keys. On average, these participants were proficient typists, banging out 72 words per miniature with 94 percent accuracy neosizeplus com. However, when quizzed, they could accurately neighbourhood an regular of only 15 letters on the blank keyboard, according to the study published in the newspaper Attention, Perception, andamp; Psychophysics.
Nutritionists Recommend That Healthy Foods
Nutritionists Recommend That Healthy Foods.
Does it de facto payment more to stick to a healthy diet? The comeback is yes, but not as much as many people think, according to a new study. The fact-finding review combined the results of 27 studies from 10 unusual countries that compared the cost of healthy and unhealthy diets. The verdict? A sustenance rich in fruits, vegetables, nuts and fish costs about a man about $1,50 more per date - or $550 per year - compared to a fare high in processed grains and meats, fat, sugar and convenience foods vigrx plus panama. By and large, protein drove the guerdon increases.
Researchers found that salubrious proteins - think a fraction of boneless skinless chicken breast - were 29 cents more valuable per serving compared to less healthy sources, for example a fried chicken nugget. The study was published online Dec 5, 2013 in the fortnightly BMJ Open. "For many low-income families, this could be a authentic barrier to nutritious eating," said study author Mayuree Rao women. She is a inferior research fellow in the department of epidemiology at the Harvard School of Public Health, in Boston.
For example, a pedigree of four that is following the USDA's niggardly eating plan has a weekly food budget of about $128. An spear-carrier $1,50 per for each human in the family a day adds up to $42 for the week, or about 30 percent of that family's total number food tab. Rao says it's wouldn't be such a big nature for many middle-class families, though. She said that "$1,50 is about the honorarium of a cup of coffee and really just a nip in the bucket when you consider the billions of dollars spent every year on diet-related long-lasting diseases".
Researchers who weren't involved in the review had mountain to say about its findings. "I am thinking that a mean difference in back of $1,50 per person per day is very substantial," said Adam Drewnowski, boss of the nutritional sciences program at the University of Washington, in Seattle. He has compared the charge of robust versus unhealthy diets. Drewnowski said that at an extra $550 per year for 200 million folk would overcome the entire annual budget for food assistance in the United States.
Dr Hilary Seligman, an subsidiary professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, said beneficial food can be dear for families in ways that go beyond its cost at the checkout. For that reason the harsh cost comparison in this review probably underestimates the true millstone to a person's budget. For example, she pointed out that kinfolk in poor neighborhoods that lack big grocery stores may not be able to afford the gas to steer to buy fresh fruits and vegetables.
They may work several jobs and not have while to prep foods from scratch. "To devour a healthy diet on a very low income requires an extraordinary number of time. It's doable, but it's really, really verifiable work. These studies just don't take things in the mood for that into account". Still, Melissa Joy Dobbins, a registered dietitian and a spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, said the learn should restore confidence to many consumers that "eating healthy doesn't have to expense more".
She said the academy recommends the following nutrient-rich, budget-friendly foods - Beans. They provision fiber, protein, iron and zinc. Dry beans are cheaper but be in want of to be soaked. Canned beans are more handy but should be rinsed to reduce the salt content. Canned beans are about 13 cents per quarter-cup serving. Dried beans sell for about 9 cents per ounce.
Does it de facto payment more to stick to a healthy diet? The comeback is yes, but not as much as many people think, according to a new study. The fact-finding review combined the results of 27 studies from 10 unusual countries that compared the cost of healthy and unhealthy diets. The verdict? A sustenance rich in fruits, vegetables, nuts and fish costs about a man about $1,50 more per date - or $550 per year - compared to a fare high in processed grains and meats, fat, sugar and convenience foods vigrx plus panama. By and large, protein drove the guerdon increases.
Researchers found that salubrious proteins - think a fraction of boneless skinless chicken breast - were 29 cents more valuable per serving compared to less healthy sources, for example a fried chicken nugget. The study was published online Dec 5, 2013 in the fortnightly BMJ Open. "For many low-income families, this could be a authentic barrier to nutritious eating," said study author Mayuree Rao women. She is a inferior research fellow in the department of epidemiology at the Harvard School of Public Health, in Boston.
For example, a pedigree of four that is following the USDA's niggardly eating plan has a weekly food budget of about $128. An spear-carrier $1,50 per for each human in the family a day adds up to $42 for the week, or about 30 percent of that family's total number food tab. Rao says it's wouldn't be such a big nature for many middle-class families, though. She said that "$1,50 is about the honorarium of a cup of coffee and really just a nip in the bucket when you consider the billions of dollars spent every year on diet-related long-lasting diseases".
Researchers who weren't involved in the review had mountain to say about its findings. "I am thinking that a mean difference in back of $1,50 per person per day is very substantial," said Adam Drewnowski, boss of the nutritional sciences program at the University of Washington, in Seattle. He has compared the charge of robust versus unhealthy diets. Drewnowski said that at an extra $550 per year for 200 million folk would overcome the entire annual budget for food assistance in the United States.
Dr Hilary Seligman, an subsidiary professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, said beneficial food can be dear for families in ways that go beyond its cost at the checkout. For that reason the harsh cost comparison in this review probably underestimates the true millstone to a person's budget. For example, she pointed out that kinfolk in poor neighborhoods that lack big grocery stores may not be able to afford the gas to steer to buy fresh fruits and vegetables.
They may work several jobs and not have while to prep foods from scratch. "To devour a healthy diet on a very low income requires an extraordinary number of time. It's doable, but it's really, really verifiable work. These studies just don't take things in the mood for that into account". Still, Melissa Joy Dobbins, a registered dietitian and a spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, said the learn should restore confidence to many consumers that "eating healthy doesn't have to expense more".
She said the academy recommends the following nutrient-rich, budget-friendly foods - Beans. They provision fiber, protein, iron and zinc. Dry beans are cheaper but be in want of to be soaked. Canned beans are more handy but should be rinsed to reduce the salt content. Canned beans are about 13 cents per quarter-cup serving. Dried beans sell for about 9 cents per ounce.
Подписаться на:
Комментарии (Atom)